๐—ช๐—ต๐—ผ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป๐˜€ โ€œ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ปโ€?

About Leadership responsibility, external supportโ€”and the moment for action

โ€œTransformationโ€ is everywhereโ€”yet often, no one truly owns it. Is it a leadership task? A job for external consultants? Or something that justโ€ฆ happens?

Letโ€™s take a closer look.


๐Ÿ” Who notices the need for transformation?

In theory, senior management should be the first to detect strategic or operational misalignment. Signals often come in the form of declining margins, missed targets, slipping deadlines, or growing organizational fatigue. But the early signs are not always clearโ€”or easy to admit.

Sometimes, frontline teams raise the red flags. But without executive attention, these warnings rarely lead to real change. And in other cases, the organization gets so busy coping with problems that no one steps back to ask: โ€œIs this still the right way of working?โ€

Bottom line:
The responsibility to notice and act lies with top leadership. Noticing isnโ€™t the hard partโ€”deciding to do something about it is.


๐Ÿงญ How does management develop the idea that transformation is needed?

Thereโ€™s a momentโ€”often subtleโ€”when an organization shifts from believing its challenges are temporary to realizing that something more fundamental must change.

This realization usually emerges from one or more of the following:

  • Repeated failures despite seemingly good initiatives
  • Fragmented efforts without clear direction or governance
  • Strategic misalignment between business goals and capabilities
  • Pressure from stakeholders, investors, or customers

Senior leaders begin to understand: โ€œWe canโ€™t fix this with the same tools that got us here.โ€
This is the moment where transformation beginsโ€”not just as an initiative, but as a mindset shift.


๐Ÿค When does it make sense to involve external support?

An organization doesnโ€™t need external help to notice the issuesโ€”but it often needs help to face them systematically.

Involving a transformation advisor or manager makes sense when:

  • Internal initiatives stall, repeat, or contradict each other
  • Thereโ€™s no clear roadmapโ€”or too many priorities
  • Decision-making is slow, fragmented, or politically charged
  • Leadership lacks the capacity (not necessarily the skill) to drive parallel streams

An external transformation leader brings:

  • Clarity through structured diagnostics
  • Objectivity in analyzing root causes
  • Capacity to set up governance, drive momentum, and measure impact
  • Courage to raise uncomfortable truthsโ€”constructively

But external support can never own the transformation. That ownership must remain with managementโ€”especially the C-suite.


๐ŸŽฏ Final thought: Ownership canโ€™t be outsourced

Transformation is a leadership obligation. It involves strategy, people, behavior, and trust. External advisors can support, guide, and challengeโ€”but not replace management ownership.

If transformation is everybodyโ€™s job, it risks becoming nobodyโ€™s responsibility.
Senior leaders must hold the torch, even when it burns.


If any of this resonatesโ€”and youโ€™re unsure how to take the next stepโ€”letโ€™s connect. I work with executive teams to bring clarity, focus, and results to their transformation journey.

Part 3: Making It Stick โ€“ Executing a Transformation That Lasts

Plans are easy. Execution is where transformation succeedsโ€”or fails.

Even the best roadmap wonโ€™t deliver results if teams are misaligned, overwhelmed, or unclear on priorities. Thatโ€™s why execution must be as structured and transparent as planning.

Here’s how to get it right:

๐Ÿ” Establish steering and feedback loops. Fortnightly alignment with clear KPIs helps spot deviations early.
๐Ÿง  Facilitate cross-functional workshops. Align understanding across the operating modelโ€”structure, governance, roles, and behaviors.
๐Ÿ“ข Communicate frequently and authentically. Silence fuels skepticism. Regular updates maintain momentum and trust.
๐Ÿ“Œ Embed the change in routines. New governance rituals, KPIs, roles, and escalation paths ensure the transformation isnโ€™t undone by old habits.
๐Ÿ“ˆ Learn and evolve. Build the capacity for continuous improvementโ€”from lessons learned to process refinement.

Transformation is not a one-time fix.
It’s the start of a new way of operatingโ€”more aligned, more accountable, and more capable of adapting.

The real success?
When the organization no longer needs the transformation managerโ€”because transformation has become part of the culture.

๐Ÿ”Ž If this resonates โ€“ letโ€™s talk.
If the situations I describe sound familiarโ€”and you’re unsure what the next step should beโ€”letโ€™s connect.
I help executive teams create clarity, focus, and momentum in complex transformation environments.

Part 2: From Complexity to Clarity โ€“ Building a Focused Transformation Plan

Once a company accepts that change is necessary, the next challenge emerges:
How do you turn complexity into a focused, executable plan?

A good transformation plan doesnโ€™t start with solutions. It starts with understanding:

  • How do your functions really work together?
  • Where are the bottlenecksโ€”and what causes them?
  • What are the interfaces and hidden dependencies?
  • Which legacy structures prevent change?
  • Which initiatives are draining resources without impact?

In my work, I often map this across key operating model components:
๐Ÿงฉ Organizational structure,
๐Ÿงฉ People & capabilities,
๐Ÿงฉ Governance & decision-making,
๐Ÿงฉ Roles & processes,
๐Ÿงฉ Culture & communication.

Hereโ€™s what I recommend:

โœ… Donโ€™t try to fix everything at once. Prioritize by impact and feasibility.
โœ… Co-develop milestones with the teams. Transformation is done with, not to, the organization.
โœ… Build realistic resource & budget scenarios. Underestimating effort is the surest path to burnout.
โœ… Embed clear communication & feedback loops. Everyone needs to know where things standโ€”and why.

The goal is not just a roadmap.
Itโ€™s a roadmap that your organization believes in and is ready to follow.

๐Ÿ”Ž If this resonates โ€“ letโ€™s talk.
If the situations I describe sound familiarโ€”and you’re unsure what the next step should beโ€”letโ€™s connect.
I help executive teams create clarity, focus, and momentum in complex transformation environments.

Keep your eyes peeled for Part 3: Making it stick!

๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐Ÿญ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฝ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป? ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ.

Admitting that your business has a problem is rarely the hard part.
Admitting that your current approach wonโ€™t fix itโ€”thatโ€™s the real hurdle.

Too often, management teams respond to declining performance with more of the same: more meetings, more reports, more pressure. They double down on whatโ€™s familiarโ€”after all, it once worked. But when results donโ€™t improve, frustration builds.

I’ve seen this in many transformation cases: a well-intentioned team applying yesterdayโ€™s tools to todayโ€™s challengesโ€”internally, with limited bandwidth, unclear root causes, and growing skepticism.

What makes the difference?

๐Ÿ‘‰ A leadership team that sees clarityโ€”not controlโ€”as the real power.
๐Ÿ‘‰ The courage to bring in a neutral, experienced perspective.
๐Ÿ‘‰ The insight that transformation isnโ€™t an admission of failure, but a signal of strength.

If youโ€™re sensing fragmentation, internal friction, or „initiative overload“ without measurable resultsโ€”these are not signs of weakness. They are early signals. And the sooner theyโ€™re addressed, the better your options.

Transformation starts with a decision:
Letโ€™s stop spinning and start steering.

๐Ÿ”Ž If this resonates โ€“ letโ€™s talk.
If the situations I describe sound familiarโ€”and you’re unsure what the next step should beโ€”letโ€™s connect.

I help executive teams create clarity, focus, and momentum in complex transformation environments.

Keep your eyes peeled for Part 2: Building a Focused Transformation

Aligning Your Operating Model: A Consultantโ€™s Guide to Driving Transformation

An effective Target Operating Model (TOM) is more than a blueprintโ€”itโ€™s the glue that binds strategy to execution. To unlock its full potential, seven key components must not only be designed well in isolation but also aligned seamlessly with one another:

  1. Organizational Structure
  2. People (Headcount & Capabilities)
  3. Geographical Footprint
  4. Roles & Responsibilities
  5. Collaboration Models & Processes
  6. Governance (Decision Forums & Escalation)
  7. Corporate Culture

Below, Iโ€™ll describe how to align these building blocksโ€”and how, as a consultant, I guide organizations through this journeyโ€”culminating in the clear benefits you can expect.


1. Start with the End in Mind: Strategy-to-Structure

Before any layer of your TOM can take shape, you must translate strategic objectives into structural imperatives:

  • Define Strategic Priorities (e.g. growth markets, cost leadership, product innovation)
  • Map Organizational Layers to those priorities (e.g. global business units, regional hubs, shared services)

A consultantโ€™s role: facilitate executive workshops to crystallize strategy, then design a high-level org chart that embeds those priorities at every level.


2. People & Capabilities: Right Skills, Right Place

Once the structure is clear, identify the critical roles and capabilities needed:

  • Headcount Planning: Quantify talent needs by function and geography
  • Capability Assessment: Benchmark existing skills against future requirements
  • Talent Roadmap: Hire, train, or redeploy people to close gaps

A consultantโ€™s role: run capability assessments, lead skill-gap analyses, and co-create a talent-development plan with HR and business leaders.


3. Geographical Footprint: Local versus Global

Your footprint should align with your structure and people strategy:

  • Centralized vs. Decentralized: Decide which functions (e.g. R&D, customer support) live in regional hubs versus centralized centers
  • Regulatory & Market Factors: Evaluate tax, labor, and customer proximity considerations

A consultantโ€™s role: model alternative footprint scenariosโ€”balancing cost, compliance, and responsivenessโ€”and recommend the optimal deployment of your teams.


4. Roles & Responsibilities: Who Does What, When

Clarity here prevents duplication and confusion:

  • RACI Matrices: Document who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for key processes
  • Role Profiles: Define the decision rights, inputs, and outputs for each core role

A consultantโ€™s role: facilitate cross-functional workshops to build RACI matrices, ensure both leadership and execution layers buy in, and lock down clear role descriptions.


5. Collaboration Models & Processes: The How of Getting Things Done

Processes are the nervous system of your TOM:

  • Process Workflows: Map end-to-end processes, from order intake to delivery and billing
  • Collaboration Platforms: Select tools (e.g. Teams, Miro, ERP) that embed your workflows

A consultantโ€™s role: lead process-mapping sessions, introduce โ€œbest practiceโ€ process models, and ensure your chosen collaboration tools are configured to support them.


6. Governance: Decision Rights & Escalation Paths

Good governance balances speed and control:

  • Decision Forums: Define which councils or committees make which decisions, at what frequency
  • Escalation Models: Clarify how and when issues move up the chain

A consultantโ€™s role: draft charters for governance bodies, recommend meeting cadences, and build dashboards that surface the right metrics to each forum.


7. Corporate Culture: The Invisible Catalyst

Culture ties it all togetherโ€”without it, even the best-designed TOM will stall:

  • Behavioral Principles: Articulate values that guide day-to-day actions (e.g. โ€œCollaborate openly,โ€ โ€œOwn the outcomeโ€)
  • Change Management: Use communications, role modeling, and quick-win celebrations to embed new ways of working

A consultantโ€™s role: design a culture-activation planโ€”ranging from leadership alignment sessions to interactive town hallsโ€”that brings your values and behaviors to life.


Bringing It All Together: The Consultantโ€™s Playbook

  1. Diagnosis & Baseline: Assess current TOM against desired future state
  2. Blueprint Design: Co-create alignment across all seven components
  3. Implementation Roadmap: Develop a sequenced plan with clear milestones, owners, and governance
  4. Execution Support: Embed a โ€œtrain-the-trainerโ€ approach, interim PMO support, and regular health-checks
  5. Sustain & Evolve: Establish continuous improvement cycles to keep your TOM fit for purpose

Key Benefits of a Holistic TOM Alignment

  • Strategic Agility: Rapid pivoting in response to market shifts
  • Operational Efficiency: Elimination of redundancies and process bottlenecks
  • Enhanced Decision-Making: Faster, more transparent governance
  • People Engagement: Clear career paths and ownership cultivate commitment
  • Risk Mitigation: Robust processes and escalation paths reduce surprises

A fully aligned Operating Model doesnโ€™t just exist on paperโ€”it drives real, sustainable performance improvements. If youโ€™re ready to give your transformation the backbone it needs, letโ€™s connect and discuss how to tailor this approach to your organization.

๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ ๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น (๐—ง๐—ข๐— )

In times of transformation, M&A, or strategic change, the Target Operating Model (TOM) often gets sidelined. Yet, it plays a central role in turning ideas into execution.

Here are five reasons why itโ€™s worth your attention:

1. Alignment of Strategy with Execution

The TOM defines the structures, processes, and behaviors that hold the organization togetherโ€”including your corporate culture. With this clarity, teams across all functions can make faster, more informed decisions.

2. Fit-for-purpose Structures

Is your current organization still the right one? TOM design helps re-assess roles, capabilities, capacities, and governance โ€“ without jumping into re-org mode too early.

3. Operational Efficiency

TOM work shines a light on overlaps, gaps, and friction. It enables process improvements and more effective use of resources.

4. Integration or Carve-out Readiness

In M&A, TOMs help ensure smooth transitions โ€“ by defining what needs to work โ€œDay 1โ€ and how the future setup will look.

5. People Engagement

A clearly communicated TOM builds trust. It helps people understand their role in the bigger picture โ€“ and reduces uncertainty in change.

My take:

Designing a TOM is not about adding complexity. Itโ€™s about giving transformation a backbone.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Have you recently worked on your TOM? Iโ€™d love to hear how you approached it.

#OperatingModel #Transformation #Leadership #MergersAndAcquisitions #PMI #CFO #StrategyExecution 

Transformation: GroรŸe Beratung zu teuer, Freelancer zu riskant?

Sie mรถchten weder Junior Consultants noch รผberteuerte Partner im Hintergrund, aber einem einzelnen Freelancer allein trauen Sie die Aufgabe nicht zu? Dann haben wir die Lรถsung!

Michael Maier und Diethard Engel steuern Ihr Projekt als eingespieltes Team โ€“ mit der Umsetzungssicherheit, die Ihr Unternehmen verlangt.

โœ… Erfolgreiche Projekte in Maschinen- & Anlagenbau, Automobilindustrie und weiteren Branchen
โœ… Perfekte Kombination aus Ingenieurs- & CFO-Expertise
โœ… Internationale Erfahrung mit komplexen Transformationen
โœ… Kontinuitรคt & Kapazitรคt fรผr groรŸe strategische Herausforderungen in Transformation, Integration und Carve-out

Wie stellen Sie den Erfolg Ihres Programms sicher? Lassen Sie uns รผber einen maรŸgeschneiderten und optimierten Ansatz sprechen.

Successful Transformation โ€“ Key Success Factors from a Recent Project

Iโ€™ve just wrapped up another business transformation project, delivering tangible improvements for my client:

  • Redesigned and transformed the contract management process
  • Clarified key tasks and roles in Procurement
  • Overhauled the entire systems landscape, including ERP implementation and multiple peripheral systems
  • Prepared the business for a carve-out and integration

This project has had a lasting impact on my clientโ€™s business, enhancing both performance and resilience. Key takeaways:

๐Ÿ”น Sustainable change requires a collaborative approach โ€“ success comes from working together.
๐Ÿ”น Building trust through direct engagement is crucial for project success.
๐Ÿ”น Scope changes are a sign of progress โ€“ they reflect the effectiveness of the work done.

KPIs in a Project-driven Business: Quality, Scope and Other

This is the last part of my series on a brief introduction of KPIs relevant to any business that is building its success on performance of distinct customer projects.

1.1        Project Quality

A project quality-KPI measures the quality of deliverables and outcomes. It may include metrics like defect rates, customer satisfaction ratings, adherence to quality standards, and number of rework or corrective actions.

Project quality has a direct impact on project expense (thus profitability), and on the probability of doing repeat business with a customer. Measuring defects will also provide input to discussing supplier issues and potentially claims.

1.2         Project Scope

This KPI assesses the project’s adherence to the defined scope and its ability to manage scope changes. Metrics may include the number of scope changes, scope creep percentage, and customer change requests. In summary, it is a metric for project planning quality.

1.3         Other, Less Critical Performance Indicators

  • Customer Satisfaction
    This KPI measures the satisfaction level of project stakeholders, including clients, end-users, and other relevant parties. It can be measured through surveys, feedback ratings, or other qualitative and quantitative assessments.
  • Project Team Performance
    This KPI measures the effectiveness of the project team in terms of collaboration, productivity, and overall performance. It may include metrics like team satisfaction ratings, employee turnover rate, and team productivity metrics.
  • Stakeholder Communication
    This KPI evaluates the effectiveness of communication within the project and with external stakeholders. Metrics may include the frequency and quality of project updates, stakeholder feedback, and communication response times.

  • Resource Productivity
    Resource Productivity is used to assess the output and deliverables produced by each resource within a given timeframe. This metric focuses on the quality and efficiency of work completed by resources, providing insights into their productivity and contribution to project outcomes.
  • Feedback and Performance Reviews
    Best-in class businesses regularly gather feedback from project managers, team members, and stakeholders regarding resource utilization. They conduct performance reviews to assess individual and team performance, identify strengths and weaknesses, and provide constructive feedback to enhance resource utilization for future endeavors.

KPIs in a Project-driven Business: Risk Management

This article focuses on identifying and mitigating project risks. It includes metrics such as the number of identified risks, risk severity ratings, risk mitigation actions taken, and overall risk exposure.

For effective risk management, each project has a risk register that is reviewed with management regularly. The risk register identifies project risk topics, mitigating measures and a mitigation status. Risks typically include availability of key resources, risks to the timeline, and customer financial risk.

Risk management should be an ongoing and proactive process throughout the project lifecycle focusing on risk recognition and avoidance rather than on incident management. As such, it is less of an KPI as a set of initiatives targeted to minimize the likelihood and impact of potential issues and to enhance project success rates. The business standard for risk management follows a number of steps:

  • Risk Identification to recognize potential risks that could arise during the project lifecycle. This involves conducting a comprehensive risk assessment by reviewing project documentation, engaging stakeholders, and leveraging past project experiences. Brainstorming sessions, checklists, and risk templates can also aid in identifying risks.
  • Risk Analysis and Assessment to analyze identified risks to determine their potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. Risk analysis assesses the severity of each risk and prioritizes risks based on their significance to focus resources and attention on high-priority risks that require proactive mitigation.
  • Risk Response Planning will result in a risk response plan to address identified risks. This involves defining appropriate strategies for each risk, such as:

Avoidance: Take actions to eliminate or avoid the risk altogether, such as changing the project approach or scope.

Mitigation: Implement measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk, such as additional quality checks or redundancy in resources.

Transfer: Transfer the risk to a third party, such as through insurance, subcontracting, or partnerships.

Acceptance: Acknowledge that the risk exists and determine how to effectively respond if it materializes. This can involve creating contingency plans or reserves to mitigate the impact.

  • Risk Monitoring and Control to monitor identified risks throughout the project lifecycle. It tracks the status of each risk, going along with  assessing any changes in risk severity or likelihood, and ensuring that risk response strategies are implemented effectively.
  • Risk Communication to keep stakeholders informed about project risks by providing regular updates on risk assessment, mitigation activities, and any changes in risk profiles. Effective communication ensures that stakeholders are aware of potential risks and their associated impacts.
  • Risk Documentation to keep track of all identified risks, risk response strategies, and their outcomes.
  • Centralized Risk Register to track and monitor risks systematically. This documentation serves as a reference for future projects and supports organizational learning and improvement.
  • Lessons Learned or post-mortem exercises at the end of a project to feed a continuous improvement process with insights and experiences related to risk management.