๐˜ผ๐™‘๐˜ผ๐™„๐™‡๐˜ผ๐˜ฝ๐™„๐™‡๐™„๐™๐™” ๐™„๐™Ž ๐™‰๐™Š๐™ ๐˜ผ ๐™Ž๐™†๐™„๐™‡๐™‡ ๐™Ž๐™€๐™

Iโ€™ve SEEN it many times. Great companies FAIL because they put the WRONG PEOPLE on the MOST IMPORTANT JOB.

Your managers? FANTASTIC at running the business. But TRANSFORMATION? Totally different game. ONCE-IN-A-DECADE. HIGH STAKES. Needs EXPERIENCE. Needs WINNERS.

If you staff it with โ€œwhoโ€™s availableโ€ โ€” you LOSE. Time wasted. ROI delayed. VALUE DESTROYED.

When I lead transformations, I bring the STRUCTURE, the SPEED, the EXECUTION. Thatโ€™s how you PROTECT value. Thatโ€™s how you CREATE value.

Would you trust your BIGGEST DEAL to whoever has TIME โ€” or to the BEST you can get?

๐—ฃ๐— ๐—œ: ๐——๐—”๐—ฌ ๐Ÿญ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—› ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜. ๐—•๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—˜.

Anybody can SIGN a deal. EASY. But INTEGRATION? Thatโ€™s the REAL TEST. Thatโ€™s where you WIN โ€” or you LOSE VALUE. BIG VALUE.

Too many put โ€œavailableโ€ people on it. WRONG! You need the BEST. You need WINNERS.

Hereโ€™s what works:
๐Ÿ”น STRONG GOVERNANCE โ€” clear ownership, no confusion.
๐Ÿ”น SYNERGY PLANS โ€” EARLY, TRACKED, DELIVERED.
๐Ÿ”น CULTURE โ€” built IN, not some โ€œside project.โ€
๐Ÿ”น EXPERIENCED PEOPLE โ€” people who have DONE IT before.

PE folks know this: if you MISS the synergy plan, you DESTROY VALUE. But if you HIT IT โ€” you MULTIPLY it. TREMENDOUS results, even if you are not POTUS.

Whatโ€™s HARDEST in your deals? SYSTEMS? CULTURE? SPEED? Connect with me, and let me hear it.

๐™๐™ƒ๐™€ ๐™๐™€๐˜ผ๐™‡ ๐™‹๐™ˆ๐™„ ๐™‹๐™‡๐˜ผ๐™”๐˜ฝ๐™Š๐™Š๐™† โ€” ๐™„๐™‰๐™๐™๐™Š

Everybody talks about PMI. Few know how to WIN it.

Iโ€™ve SEEN the big mistakes:
โŒ Companies think Day 1 is the END โ€” WRONG.
โŒ They staff with whoever is โ€œavailableโ€ โ€” DISASTER.
โŒ They IGNORE culture โ€” deal value gone.
โŒ They move TOO SLOW โ€” competitors LOVE that.
โŒ They start TOO MANY PROJECTS โ€” BAD.

PMI is where DEAL VALUE is WON or LOST.
And I KNOW how to WIN. Iโ€™ve DONE IT. Many times. BEAUTIFUL.

Over the next days Iโ€™ll share ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฃ๐— ๐—œ ๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฌ๐—•๐—ข๐—ข๐—ž: short, powerful lessons from integrations Iโ€™ve led. No theory. No fluff. Just WHAT WORKS, even if you are not POTUS. Stay tuned. This will be STRONG.

Why Contract Management Is the Hidden Lever in Project Success

When projects fail to deliver on time, on budget, or at expected margins, the root cause is often not the engineering, the technology, or even the customer. More often, it lies in how contracts are structured, managed, and executed.

Contract Management is not paperwork โ€” it is project management in practice.

From proposal through delivery, a strong contract management discipline drives clarity, reduces risks, and protects profitability. Letโ€™s break down why it matters โ€” and what โ€œgoodโ€ looks like.


1. Contracts start before the contract is signed

In many organizations, contract management is treated as an afterthought. But the seeds of success (or failure) are planted much earlier โ€” in the proposal and tender process.

  • Involving engineering, procurement, and project management early avoids gaps and misaligned expectations.
  • Using structured checklists and scoring models helps decide when deeper technical consultation is needed.
  • Better-prepared bids increase hit rates and reduce margin leakage later.

2. Scope clarity prevents costly disputes

The difference between a Lastenheft (customerโ€™s requirements) and a Pflichtenheft (detailed supplier specification) may sound academic, but in practice it is the line between smooth execution and endless disputes.

  • A precise inquiry (Pflichtenheft) is the foundation for project planning, budgeting, and risk management.
  • Everything not clarified upfront will turn into a change order or worse, a claim.

3. Change is inevitable โ€” manage it

Scope changes are unavoidable. The difference lies in how they are handled:

  • Change orders (Nachtrรคge) should follow a formal process with clear documentation, impact analysis, and customer approval before implementation.
  • Claims (Nachforderungen) arise when changes are disputed. At this stage, costs are higher, relationships strained, and outcomes uncertain.

A disciplined contract management framework moves more changes into the โ€œcontrolledโ€ bucket and fewer into the โ€œconflictโ€ bucket.


4. Contract management is cash flow management

Good contract management is not just about avoiding losses โ€” itโ€™s also about improving liquidity.

Clear milestone acceptance criteria accelerate invoicing.

Continuous tracking of project costs and cost-to-come will form a solid base for PoC (Percentage of Completion) and ensures financial transparency.

Active steering of payment terms, securities, and guarantees stabilizes project cash flow.


5. Itโ€™s a team sport

Successful contract management requires more than legal expertise. It involves:

Sales, engineering, procurement, and project management working in sync.

Standardized documentation and clear governance structures.

Leadership commitment to continuous improvement, learning, and sharing best practices.


The ROI of getting it right

Strong contract management means:

Higher margins (through reduced leakage and better risk control)

Faster project starts (with better-prepared bids and handovers)

Fewer disputes (thanks to clarity and structure)

Stronger customer and supplier relationships

In short: Contract management is not an administrative burden โ€” itโ€™s a value driver.


โœ… If this resonates, and youโ€™d like to explore how to strengthen contract management in your organization, letโ€™s connect.

Busy People are your Problem

The realization has set in: change is necessary. Markets evolve, customer expectations shift, competitive pressure grows โ€” and standing still is not an option.

But hereโ€™s the challenge: the day-to-day business doesnโ€™t pause just because transformation is required. Operations, customers, and financial commitments remain the top priority. And in most organizations, people are already stretched thin. Spare capacity for a complex transformation program is rare.

The Availability Trap

When internal resources become โ€œavailable,โ€ the instinct is often to assign them to transformation initiatives. But ask yourself:

  • Do they have the competence and experience to design, align, and execute a complex program?
  • Do they have the standing within the organization to make tough decisions stick?

Because one thing is clear: availability is not a skill set.

How to Free Up Resources

Some companies try to create bandwidth by shifting more routine tasks away from management, creating breathing room for leaders to focus on transformation. While this helps, it is often not enough. Transformation requires dedicated expertise, structure, and focus โ€” qualities that are hard to maintain when you are simultaneously running the daily business.

The Role of External Support

This is where external support adds real value. Experienced transformation leaders bring:

  • Clarity in framing and prioritizing initiatives
  • Focus on execution, avoiding detours and delays
  • Structure to align teams and keep programs on track
  • Delivery certainty, based on repetition and proven methods

Even more important: external experts accelerate implementation. And speed matters โ€” because the earlier synergies, cost savings, and growth effects are realized, the faster the transformation pays for itself. In fact, this acceleration is the ROI of external support.

Final Thought

Transformation is not about choosing between business-as-usual and change. Itโ€™s about ensuring both run in parallel โ€” the daily business without disruption, and the transformation with the focus it requires. With the right mix of internal commitment and external expertise, companies can achieve both.

๐Ÿ‘‰ If this resonates and youโ€™d like to explore how to balance transformation with daily business in your organization, feel free to connect with me.

โ€œ๐—”๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜.โ€

When companies set up transformation programs, itโ€™s tempting to staff them with whoever is available internally. But availability alone doesnโ€™t equal readiness.

Transformations are rare, often once-in-a-lifetime events for most organizations. Internal leaders and teams may be excellent in their day-to-day business โ€” but lack the routine and repetition required to steer and deliver such programs with confidence.

Thatโ€™s where experienced transformation leaders come in. With proven methodologies and execution discipline, they move faster, stay focused, and avoid the pitfalls of trial-and-error. The result? Earlier realization of synergies, accelerated cost reductions, stronger market impact, smoother integration โ€” and ultimately, higher ROI on the program itself.

Thatโ€™s why bringing in experienced transformation leaders isn’t a cost โ€” itโ€™s an accelerator of ROI, ensuring synergies, cost savings, and market gains are realized sooner.

๐Ÿ‘‰ If this makes you think, and youโ€™d like to explore how external expertise could support your transformation or change program, letโ€™s connect.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜€๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ T๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป

Itโ€™s rarely the big strategic questions. Much more often, itโ€™s the small things:

ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Functional interfaces that donโ€™t align
ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Missing pieces of information
ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย A lack of structure in execution or customer communication

Surprisingly, management is usually aware of these issues. And yet, decisive action doesnโ€™t follow. Thatโ€™s where value gets lost.

The difference-maker? Moving from awareness to implementation.

๐Ÿ” My role in many projects is exactly that:

ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Identify the real root cause
ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Reconcile countermeasures across functions
ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Align resources
ยทย ย ย ย ย ย ย Drive swift, focused execution

Because at the end of the day:

๐Ÿ‘‰ Awareness is good โ€” but implementation is king.

If this resonates, and youโ€™d like to exchange perspectives, Iโ€™m always happy to connect and discuss how to capture value in your context. Curious how this plays out in your business. I am looking forward to your comments.

5 Questions I Ask Before Starting Any Transformation Program

Before I help a client launch a transformation, I ask these five questions.
If we donโ€™t have clear answers, we donโ€™t start. Itโ€™s that simple.


1. Whatโ€™s the real problem weโ€™re solving?

Be honest. Is it a cost issue? A customer issue? A culture issue?
Transformation without diagnosis is theater.


2. What does success look like โ€” and who defines it?

Is it EBIT margin? Resilience? A new org model?
And whose expectations shape that?


3. Whoโ€™s sponsoring the program โ€” and how visible are they?

Without senior ownership, no transformation survives long.
Is leadership ready to lead from the front?


4. What internal resources are available โ€” and whatโ€™s missing?

You canโ€™t staff transformation with whoever is free.
Top people make the difference.
My Rule #4: Availability is not a skill set.


5. How will we handle all the โ€œother stuffโ€ weโ€™ll discover?

No plan survives contact with reality. Youโ€™ll find other issues.
Have a system for capturing and sequencing them โ€” or theyโ€™ll derail your program.

Transformation on Demand

When You Need Impact, Not a Consultant Army

Not every transformation needs a slide-heavy consulting team. Sometimes you need a pragmatic partner who moves things forward with you. Thatโ€™s what โ€œtransformation on demandโ€ is about.


It works when:

  • You have a program but no structure
  • You need momentum without increasing internal workload
  • You want senior impact โ€” not junior staffing

It brings:

  • Clarity on scope, timeline and resources
  • Structured check-ins
  • Hands-on support with just enough documentation
  • An external view, free from internal politics

The value?

You get:

  • Faster progress
  • Focused implementation
  • Better decisions โ€” with less internal distraction

Transformation isnโ€™t about doing more โ€” itโ€™s about doing what matters, in the right order, and with the right energy.

What Makes a Good Carve-Out Plan?

Carve-outs are the open-heart surgeries of business. One wrong move โ€” and the patient bleeds cash, customers, or talent.

Hereโ€™s what separates smooth carve-outs from painful ones.


1. Start with a clear scope and end-state

Define:

  • Whatโ€™s in scope?
  • Whatโ€™s the NewCoโ€™s minimum viable setup?
  • What must be ready by Day 1?

Ambiguity here creates chaos later.


2. Plan with functions โ€” not just for them

Finance, IT, HR, Operations, Salesโ€ฆ each team needs to co-design the carve-out.

This avoids surprises and ensures ownership.


3. Build your TSA logic early

Donโ€™t treat TSAs (transitional service agreements) as an afterthought.

Agree early:

  • What services are needed
  • For how long
  • At what cost
  • With what exit logic

4. Address organizational identity

The NewCo isnโ€™t just a legal entity.
It needs:

  • A leadership team
  • Roles and processes
  • A minimum culture and communication backbone

5. Donโ€™t skip the culture and compliance dimension

Align values, define behaviors, and ensure legal basics:

  • Contracts
  • IP rights
  • Licenses
  • Data ownership
  • Code of conduct